Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03377
Original file (BC 2013 03377.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	   	    DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03377
                                    COUNSEL:  NONE
    	                            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, be corrected to show award of the Armed Forces Service 
Medal (AFSM). 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
 
The AFSM is not reflected on his DD Form 214. 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) citation.  
 
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 7 Sep 1976, the applicant entered active duty.

On 30 Sep 1996, he was retired.

The applicant served 20 years and 24 days on active duty.  

The AFSM, authorized by Executive Order 12985, 11 Jan 1996, is 
awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the U.S. who, after   
1 Jun 1992: (1) participate, or have participated, as members of 
U.S. military units, in a U.S. military operation that is deemed 
to be a significant activity by the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and 
(2) encounter no foreign armed opposition or imminent threat of 
hostile action.

The Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) was established on  
4 Dec 1961, to be awarded to members of the United States Armed 
Forces who, after 1 Jul 1958, participated in a United States 
military operation and encountered foreign armed opposition, or 
were in danger of hostile action by foreign Armed Forces.

________________________________________________________________


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial.  After a thorough review of the 
applicant’s military personnel records, DPSID was unable to 
verify the applicant served in the area of eligibility for award 
of the AFSM.  The AFSM for Operation PROVIDE PROMISE is awarded 
for providing support for Yugoslavia in an area encompassing the 
total land and air space of the former Republic of Yugoslavia, 
Hungary, and Italy; the waters and air space above that portion 
of the Adriatic Sea that lies north of 40 degrees north 
latitude, from 1 Jun 1992 to 20 Dec 1995.  The AFSM was not 
awarded for Operation RESTORE HOPE; however, the AFEM for 
Operation RESTORE Hope is awarded for the period from 5 Dec   
1992 to 31 Mar 1995, with an area of operation encompassing the 
total land area and air space of Somalia, that portion of Kenyan 
land area and air space east of 38 degrees east longitude, the 
Gulf of Aden, and that portion of the Indian Ocean north of five 
degrees south latitude and west 55 degrees east longitude.  
Since there is no evidence the applicant served in the area of 
eligibility for award of the AFSM or AFEM, DPSID recommends the 
applicant’s request be denied.  To grant the applicant relief 
would be contrary to the eligibility criteria established by the 
Department of Defense (DOD) Manual 1348.33, Manual for Military 
Decorations and Awards.   

Upon the Board’s final decision, the applicant’s records will be 
administratively corrected to reflect award of the Air Force 
Longevity Service Medal with four Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters 
(AFLSA w/4BOLC).  

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 31 Oct 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit 
D).  As of this date, this office has not received a response.   

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.    

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale that the applicant has not been the 
victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, other than the 
administrative correction awarding the AFLSA w/4BOLC, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.  
 
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-03377 in Executive Session on 6 May 2014, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
     
 	 , Panel Chair
	 , Member
	 , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

         Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 Jul 2013, w/atch.
         Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records
         Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 16 Sep 2013. 
	 Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Oct 2013.  



		
        
                                       Panel Chair
 


 


 

 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01942

    Original file (BC 2013 01942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served in support of Operation ELF ONE from 3 Jun 81 thru 16 Oct 81. The AFEM may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who after 1 Jul 58, participate, or have participated as members of the U.S. military units in a U.S. military operation in which service members of any Military Department participate, in the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in significant numbers. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03904

    Original file (BC 2013 03904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) certificate dated 15 Jun 1998, for Operation SOUTHERN WATCH. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02378

    Original file (BC 2013 02378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02378 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect she was authorized and awarded the Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02310

    Original file (BC-2008-02310.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFPC/DPSIDR’s complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 25 Jul 08, for review and response within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00825

    Original file (BC 2013 00825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00825 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. In a letter dated 21 March 2012, DPSIDRA advised the applicant that his DD Form 214, dated 15 September 1993, states in Section 18 that he served in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM and that this statement only verifies that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02414

    Original file (BC 2013 02414.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no official documentation in the applicant’s military personnel record to verify he deployed in support of a qualifying operation in a qualifying area of eligibility for award of the Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kingdom of Saudi Arabia or the Kuwait Liberation Medal-Government of Kuwait. Upon final Board decision, administrative correction of his official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR. ________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03602

    Original file (BC-2012-03602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Although the applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects that he served from 2 Aug 90 through 23 Feb 91, in support of Operation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017573

    Original file (20100017573.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) is authorized for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. c. The GWOTSM is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have participated in Global War on Terrorism operations outside of the AOEs designated for award of the GWOTEM, Afghanistan Campaign Medal, or ICM. The governing Army regulation also shows the AFSM may be awarded...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02553

    Original file (BC 2013 02553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to reflect Foreign Service in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He participated in Operation SOUTHERN WATCH from approximately 6 Dec 97 through 27 Apr 98 for 127 days. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02870

    Original file (BC 2014 02870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States, dated 23 July 1984, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve. The Outstanding Airman of the Year Ribbon is awarded to Airmen competing at Air Force level in the 12 Outstanding Airmen of the Year Program. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 March 2015.